Risk
726
Critical and High-rated Work Orders based on the active company configuration.
- Critical Work Orders
- 219
- High-rated Work Orders
- 507
Interactive demo workspaceImmediate demo access
Use MaintPilot yourself in five minutes
Work directly with the cockpit, analyses, Asset 360°, Action Center and Reports. One consistent Asset case shows how an unusual signal becomes a traceable decision.
No account, registration or storage of demo or product data. All data is synthetic and provided afresh on every visit.
The specific Asset case
Packaging Line J requires a well-supported decision.
The synthetic data shows three recurring bearing failures, 86 hours of downtime, six open Work Orders and increased annual costs. The team must decide whether to review the maintenance strategy.
Is this a single signal, or a documented pattern that now requires Action?
Your walkthrough
From shift start to a well-supported decision
Follow a realistic workflow. Each view answers one practical question before the next decision is made.
- 01
Assess the situation
Why does Packaging Line J require attention today?
- 02
Identify the change
How have its failures and costs developed?
- 03
Understand the context
Which Work Orders, Spare Parts and Maintenance records are linked by Evidence?
- 04
Put the meaning into context
What do the Findings mean for Packaging Line J?
- 05
Prioritize the Action
Which review should the team start first?
- 06
Review the reasoning
Which data, rules and limitations support the Action?
- 07
Share the decision
How is the decision shared with production and management?
- 08
Choose the next step
If the approach fits, the Pilot Program can be assessed together.
01Shift start · Dashboard and Executive Cockpit
The decision-relevant situation at a glance
The cockpit brings Packaging Line J into focus through recurring bearing failures, downtime and increased costs. Data limitations remain visible.
You can see in seconds why this Asset requires attention today.
All three import areas activeNo accepted import yet
Executive Brief
Decision-relevant overview based on available maintenance data
Summarized using rules, with no AI or unsupported Trends. Every statement links to the underlying detailed view.
726 Work Orders are rated Critical or High by active company rules.
Source: Operational Intelligence rules
Daily Intelligence provides 5 evidenced rule Findings as the Data Basis. The operational sequence is shown only in Action Intelligence.
Source: Daily Intelligence · data source
27 Assets are critical and 28 require attention; only assessments with medium or high Assessment Reliability are included.
Source: Asset Health
The quantifiable rule-based reduction potential is CHF 2k.
Source: Spare Part analysis
Executive KPIs
Five management perspectives with clearly stated data limitations.
Availability
Cannot be calculated
Production time and downtime are not included in the available data.
- Open Breakdown Work Orders 101/102
- 219
- Overdue open Work Orders
- 217
Capital
CHF 57.29M
Known inventory value; reduction potential based only on evidenced rules.
- Rule-based reduction potential
- CHF 2k
- Inventory values known
- 3'088
Maintenance
427
active Maintenance Items; does not indicate maintenance effectiveness.
- Total items
- 427
- Active indicator unknown
- 0
- Incomplete context
- 0
Data Quality
0
Field-specific Data Quality Findings; a record may be counted more than once.
- Finding types
- 0
- Reliably assessed Assets
- 64
Import Version Comparison
Since the Previous Import Version
No Comparison Basis is available yet.
No immediate previous version is available for the selected persistent import data sets. Change values and Trends are therefore not shown.
Transparency
Data Quality
A record can be counted in more than one Finding category.
No field-specific Data Quality Findings from the active imports.
Asset Health
Top Assets Requiring Action
Lowest reliable scores; Assessment Reliability must be medium or high.
Production Unit 05
MPA1-PRD-U-05
- Assessment Reliability
- High
- Data Coverage
- 100 %
- Open Work Orders
- 14
- Open Breakdowns
- 9
Production Unit 29
MPA1-PRD-U-29
- Assessment Reliability
- High
- Data Coverage
- 100 %
- Open Work Orders
- 14
- Open Breakdowns
- 10
Production Unit 25
MPA1-PRD-U-25
- Assessment Reliability
- High
- Data Coverage
- 100 %
- Open Work Orders
- 14
- Open Breakdowns
- 9
Production Unit 17
MPA1-PRD-U-17
- Assessment Reliability
- High
- Data Coverage
- 100 %
- Open Work Orders
- 14
- Open Breakdowns
- 9
Production Unit 56
MPA1-PRD-U-56
- Assessment Reliability
- High
- Data Coverage
- 100 %
- Open Work Orders
- 13
- Open Breakdowns
- 8
Method: Rule-based summary of the maintenance data available in MaintPilot. The cockpit is neither a condition measurement nor a failure prediction. Active Maintenance Items: 427.
02Change · Historical Intelligence
Identify change
Review the unusual signal across several data points
Comparing stored Import Versions shows how failures and costs for Packaging Line J have developed. The same comparison range applies to the views that follow.
You can see that the decision is not based on a single Snapshot.
v1.0 Release 1No AIPersistent SAP Import Versions only Synthetic demo history
Historical Intelligence
Developments across available Import Versions are calculated reproducibly. Every statement references the underlying Import Versions; changes over time are never interpreted as cause or effect.
Compare Mode
Compare two Snapshots supported by Evidence. The baseline Snapshot must be dated no later than the comparison Snapshot.
The evidenced Snapshots 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026 are compared. 4 of 4 SAP source areas use different Import Versions. No intermediate values are added and no causality is asserted.
Baseline Evidence · 15/05/2026
Maintenance orders
v1 · 15.05.2026
470 valid records
Maintenance orders
v1 · 15.05.2026
712 valid records
Spare Parts
v1 · 15.05.2026
1'792 valid records
Maintenance Items
v1 · 15.05.2026
214 valid records
Comparison Evidence · 15/07/2026
Maintenance orders
v3 · 15.07.2026
854 valid records
Maintenance orders
v3 · 15.07.2026
1'293 valid records
Spare Parts
v3 · 15.07.2026
3'088 valid records
Maintenance Items
v3 · 15.07.2026
427 valid records
Open Work Orders
854
+384 · +81.7 %
Rule-rated Critical Work Orders
726
+327 · +82.0 %
Overdue Work Orders
217
+217
Known inventory value
CHF 57.29M
+CHF 24.30M · +73.6 %
KPI Trends
Work Order backlog for each available Import Version, with no estimates between Import Versions.
Health Trends
Average of assessable Asset Health Scores only. Assessability remains visible separately.
Currently assessable
64
Currently critical
27
Spare Part Trends
Known Stock values and fully calculable reduction potential for each Import Version's Spare Part data.
Data Quality Trends
Field-level Findings and import warnings are shown separately to avoid interpreting the same issue twice.
Asset Trends
Trend for an Asset matched exactly by Functional Location. Missing assessments remain null and are not filled in.
| Snapshot | Score | Open | Overdue | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.05.2026 | 61.0 | 6 | 0 | 95 % |
| 15.06.2026 | 62.0 | 6 | 0 | 97 % |
| 15.07.2026 | 51.0 | 6 | 6 | 100 % |
Import Version Comparison
Complete KPI comparison with neutral descriptions of each Delta and traceable source Import Versions.
| KPI | 15/05/2026 | 15/07/2026 | Delta | Statement supported by Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Open Work Orders | 470 | 854 | +384 | Open Work Orders changed by +384 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Rule-rated Critical Work Orders | 399 | 726 | +327 | Rule-rated Critical Work Orders changed by +327 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Completed Work Orders | 712 | 1'293 | +581 | Completed Work Orders changed by +581 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Overdue Work Orders | 0 | 217 | +217 | Overdue Work Orders changed by +217 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Actual costs of open Work Orders | CHF 2.87M | CHF 5.29M | +CHF 2.42M | Actual costs of open Work Orders changed by +2,419,758.4 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Known inventory value | CHF 33.00M | CHF 57.29M | +CHF 24.30M | Known inventory value changed by +24,295,542.5 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Below Safety Stock | 6 | 13 | +7 | Below Safety Stock changed by +7 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Materials with no Stock Turnover | 2 | 2 | 0 | Materials with no Stock Turnover remained unchanged between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. No cause is inferred from this. |
Calculable reduction potential | CHF 2k | CHF 2k | +CHF 80 | Calculable reduction potential changed by +80 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Data Quality Findings | 404 | 0 | -404 | Data Quality Findings changed by −404 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Validation warnings | 16 | 0 | -16 | Validation warnings changed by −16 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Validation errors | 0 | 0 | 0 | Validation errors remained unchanged between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. No cause is inferred from this. |
Average assessable Asset Health Score | 80.9 | 65.6 | -15.3 | Average assessable Asset Health Score changed by −15.3 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Critical Asset Health assessments | 1 | 27 | +26 | Critical Asset Health assessments changed by +26 between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. The observed change does not establish a cause or effect. |
Assessable Assets | 64 | 64 | 0 | Assessable Assets remained unchanged between 15/05/2026 and 15/07/2026. No cause is inferred from this. |
Methodological Limit
Each point in time represented by a persistent Import Version creates a Snapshot. For each SAP source type, the latest version created no later than the Snapshot applies.
Trends compare only calculated values from existing Snapshots. Intermediate values are not interpolated, and changes are not interpreted as cause or effect.
03Context · Relationship Intelligence and Asset 360°
Understand relationships
Open the documented context around Line J
The Relationship Explorer links the packaging line to its Work Orders, Maintenance records and explicitly assigned Spare Parts. Asset 360° brings the context together in one place.
You can see what is demonstrably related without claiming an unsupported cause.
Asset 360°Plant MPA160 Relationships
Packaging Line J
MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
A central, evidence-based entry point for Health, Work Orders, Maintenance, costs, Spare Parts and the Timeline. Every Relationship shows how it was established and does not prove causality.
51/100
High
Data Coverage 100 %
Asset Network
The network shows only approved exact edges from the selected data set. Lines indicate shared context, never cause or effect.
Verified · 100/100
Central Asset
Packaging Line J
MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
0
Related Assets
No edge supported by Evidence
36
Work Orders
36 network nodes supported by Evidence
12
Maintenance
12 network nodes supported by Evidence
12
Spare Parts
12 network nodes supported by Evidence
Network scope: 61 nodes and 60 supported edges. The view does not add Relationships that are not present as Evidence records.
Related Assets
Shared Context Supported by Evidence Only
Assets appear only when they share the same explicitly assigned Material Number or the same documented Maintenance Plan number.
No Related Assets supported by Evidence
The active data set contains no approved shared Material or Maintenance Plan context. Similarities are not used.
Relationship Explorer
Every Relationship can be traced to its rule, match field, source reference and Methodological Limit.
60 of 60 Relationships
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0001 · Monthly visual and functional inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0001 · Monthly visual and functional inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0001
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0002 · Quarterly mechanical inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0002 · Quarterly mechanical inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0002
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0003 · Annual electrical safety inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0003 · Annual electrical safety inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0003
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0004 · Monthly visual and functional inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0004 · Monthly visual and functional inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0004
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0005 · Quarterly mechanical inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0005 · Quarterly mechanical inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0005
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0006 · Annual electrical safety inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0006 · Annual electrical safety inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0006
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0007 · Monthly visual and functional inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0007 · Monthly visual and functional inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0007
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0008 · Quarterly mechanical inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0008 · Quarterly mechanical inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0008
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0009 · Annual electrical safety inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0009 · Annual electrical safety inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0009
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0010 · Monthly visual and functional inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0010 · Monthly visual and functional inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0010
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0011 · Quarterly mechanical inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0011 · Quarterly mechanical inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0011
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0012 · Annual electrical safety inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Verified · 100/100
Maintenance · RI-R001
MPA-MI-0012 · Annual electrical safety inspection
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Maintenance Item
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-maintenance-0012
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000001 · Review recurring drive bearing failure
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000001 · Review recurring drive bearing failure
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000001
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000002 · Review recurring drive bearing failure
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000002 · Review recurring drive bearing failure
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000002
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000003 · Review recurring drive bearing failure
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000003 · Review recurring drive bearing failure
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000003
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000004 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000004 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000004
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000005 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000005 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000005
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000006 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000006 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000006
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000007 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000007 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000007
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000008 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000008 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000008
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000009 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000009 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000009
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000010 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000010 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000010
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000011 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000011 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000011
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000012 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000012 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000012
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000013 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000013 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000013
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000014 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000014 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000014
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000015 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000015 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000015
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000016 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000016 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000016
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000017 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000017 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000017
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000018 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000018 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000018
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000019 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000019 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000019
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000020 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000020 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000020
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000021 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000021 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000021
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000022 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000022 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000022
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000023 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000023 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000023
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000024 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000024 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000024
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000025 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000025 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000025
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000026 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000026 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000026
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000027 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000027 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000027
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000028 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000028 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000028
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000029 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000029 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000029
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000030 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000030 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000030
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000031 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000031 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000031
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000032 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000032 · Perform vibration analysis
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000032
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000033 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000033 · Inspect circuit breaker
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000033
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000034 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000034 · Inspect safety light barrier
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000034
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000035 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000035 · Align sensors
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000035
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000036 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Verified · 100/100
Work Order · RI-R001
MPA-WO-000036 · Inspect drive unit
Exactly matching Functional Location in the Work Order
Evidence View
- Match
- technicalLocation = MPA1-PRD-PKG-J
- Source IDs
- demo-order-000036
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Exactly matching Functional Location in source and target
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0001 · Servo controller 15 kW
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0001 · Servo controller 15 kW
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0001
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0001
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0002 · Deep-groove ball bearing 6208-2RS
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0002 · Deep-groove ball bearing 6208-2RS
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0002
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0002
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0003 · Inductive proximity sensor
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0003 · Inductive proximity sensor
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0003
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0003
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0004 · Frequency converter 7.5 kW
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0004 · Frequency converter 7.5 kW
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0004
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0004
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0005 · Seal kit DN50
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0005 · Seal kit DN50
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0005
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0005
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0006 · Circuit breaker 16 A
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0006 · Circuit breaker 16 A
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0006
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0006
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0007 · PLC module
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0007 · PLC module
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0007
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0007
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0008 · V-belt SPZ 1250
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0008 · V-belt SPZ 1250
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0008
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0008
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0009 · Hydraulic filter 10 μm
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0009 · Hydraulic filter 10 μm
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0009
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0009
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0010 · Coupling insert size 38
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0010 · Coupling insert size 38
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0010
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0010
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0011 · Temperature transmitter
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0011 · Temperature transmitter
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0011
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0011
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0012 · Hexagon bolt M12×40
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Verified · 100/100
Spare Part · RI-R003
MPA-SP-0012 · Hexagon bolt M12×40
Explicit synthetic Material-to-Asset assignment for the demo
Evidence View
- Match
- materialNumber = MPA-SP-0012
- Source IDs
- demo-part-0012
- Source Files
- MaintPilot Demo Data
Relationship Confidence Basis
- Explicit operational material-to-Asset assignment
The value assesses the traceability of the assignment, not cause, effect or probability. No causal claim.
04Priority · Action Intelligence
Prioritize the next action
Review the maintenance strategy deliberately
The Action Plan prioritizes a review of the maintenance strategy for Packaging Line J. The card separates operational significance, current urgency and methodological limitations.
You can see the next review, its rationale and the Evidence supporting its Priority.
DeterministicNo AINo predictionsSynthetic demo data
From an evidence-based Finding to a transparent Action
The Action Engine uses existing Actions, priorities, reasoning and Evidence. It does not create new Recommendations or change production data.
- Critical
- 5
- High
- 25
- Medium
- 0
- Low
- 0
Today’s Action Plan
Review Today
The five highest-priority Actions currently available. “Today” does not imply an automatically derived deadline.
1
CriticalAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review critical Spare Parts · Packaging Line J
Next Operational Step
Review Stock, supply status and existing Spare Part Recommendations.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for a domain review of supply; it does not create an order automatically.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 1 critical parts with no Stock and 2 critical Recommendations in the evidenced Asset context. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
1 critical parts with no Stock and 2 critical Recommendations in the evidenced Asset context.
- MPA1-PRD-PKG-JRelationship Intelligence
60 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
2
CriticalAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Increase Stock · Packaging Line J
Next Operational Step
Review availability and increase Stock by at least 1 units to reach the Safety Stock level.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Candidate for reviewing continuity of supply.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: The Z part has 0 units in Stock, below the Safety Stock level of 1. The shortfall is 1 units. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The Action carries over an existing rule-based Recommendation; it is not an order, approval or guarantee of an outcome.
Expected Benefit
Reduce supply and downtime risk for a very important material
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- MP-R003 · MPA-SP-0001Recommendation Engine
MaintPilot Demo Data, MaintPilot Demo Data · Confidence 100/100
- Explicit Asset assignmentRelationship Intelligence
Material MPA-SP-0001 is linked to the Asset by stored Evidence.
3
CriticalAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Critical material · Packaging Line J
Next Operational Step
Clarify availability, lead time and alternatives immediately; escalate and place an order if required.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Critical notice to review continuity of supply.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: The material is classified as a very important Z part, but no Stock is available. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The Action carries over an existing rule-based Recommendation; it is not an order, approval or guarantee of an outcome.
Expected Benefit
Avoid unplanned downtime caused by missing Spare Parts with limited availability
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- MP-R006 · MPA-SP-0001Recommendation Engine
MaintPilot Demo Data, MaintPilot Demo Data · Confidence 100/100
- Explicit Asset assignmentRelationship Intelligence
Material MPA-SP-0001 is linked to the Asset by stored Evidence.
4
CriticalAction CardRegistry 1
Review 110 Work Orders · PM01 + 101
Next Operational Step
Review the Work Orders rated by this rule and determine their operational sequence.
Why It Matters
The company configured this rating for this exact combination of criteria.
Why Now?
Current evidenced finding: 110 Work Orders match the active rule. No due date is inferred from this match.
Methodological Limits
Exact comparison of PM type and maintenance activity type. MaintPilot adds no criteria, weighting or urgency.
Expected Benefit
Company-defined criticality can be addressed consistently with a visible rule basis.
Traceability (1 Evidence item)
- PM01 + 101Operational Intelligence rules
PM type = PM01; maintenance activity type = 101; rating = Critical; matching Work Orders = 110. Rule configured under: Settings → Operational Intelligence → Criticality Rules.
5
CriticalAction CardRegistry 1
Review 109 Work Orders · PM02 + 102
Next Operational Step
Review the Work Orders rated by this rule and determine their operational sequence.
Why It Matters
The company configured this rating for this exact combination of criteria.
Why Now?
Current evidenced finding: 109 Work Orders match the active rule. No due date is inferred from this match.
Methodological Limits
Exact comparison of PM type and maintenance activity type. MaintPilot adds no criteria, weighting or urgency.
Expected Benefit
Company-defined criticality can be addressed consistently with a visible rule basis.
Traceability (1 Evidence item)
- PM02 + 102Operational Intelligence rules
PM type = PM02; maintenance activity type = 102; rating = Critical; matching Work Orders = 109. Rule configured under: Settings → Operational Intelligence → Criticality Rules.
Action Center
Additional Actions
The five Actions in Today’s Action Plan are excluded here. The filter changes only the view, not the priority or data basis.
6
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Packaging Line J
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-PKG-JRelationship Intelligence
60 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
7
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Packaging Line J
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 6 overdue and 4 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
6 overdue and 4 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-PKG-JRelationship Intelligence
60 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
8
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 01
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 9 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
9 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-01Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
9
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 01
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 2 overdue and 0 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
2 overdue and 0 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-01Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
10
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 02
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-02Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
11
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 02
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 3 overdue and 3 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
3 overdue and 3 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-02Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
12
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 03
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 overdue and 1 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 overdue and 1 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-03Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
13
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 04
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 1 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
1 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-04Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
14
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 04
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 overdue and 1 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 overdue and 1 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-04Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
15
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 05
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 9 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
9 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-05Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
16
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 05
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 3 overdue and 2 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
3 overdue and 2 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-05Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
17
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 06
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-06Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
18
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 06
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 3 overdue and 1 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
3 overdue and 1 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-06Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
19
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 07
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 overdue and 1 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 overdue and 1 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-07Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
20
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 08
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 2 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
2 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-08Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
21
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 08
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 overdue and 2 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 overdue and 2 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-08Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
22
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 09
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 9 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
9 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-09Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
23
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 09
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 2 overdue and 0 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
2 overdue and 0 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-09Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
24
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 10
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 3 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
3 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-10Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
25
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 10
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 overdue and 3 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 overdue and 3 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-10Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
26
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 11
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 overdue and 3 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 overdue and 3 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-11Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
27
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 12
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 2 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
2 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-12Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
28
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Review the Work Order backlog · Production Unit 12
Next Operational Step
Assess overdue and high-Priority Work Orders in their operational context.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for an operational review of the evidenced Maintenance Backlog.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 4 overdue and 0 high-Priority open Work Orders. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
4 overdue and 0 high-Priority open Work Orders.
- MPA1-PRD-U-12Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
29
HighAction CardRegistry 1.1.0
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders · Production Unit 13
Next Operational Step
Review open Breakdown Work Orders by Priority, date and operational impact.
Work OrdersWhy It Matters
Calls for operational prioritization based on the available Evidence.
Why Now?
Current evidenced Finding: 9 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location. This does not automatically establish time-based urgency or a deadline.
Methodological Limits
The underlying Asset Health assessment is a rule-based model, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Expected Benefit
The evidenced review requirement can be addressed within its existing Asset context; no result or effect is predicted.
Traceability (2 Evidence items)
- Asset Health RecommendationRecommendation Engine
9 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 at the Functional Location.
- MPA1-PRD-U-13Relationship Intelligence
90 stored Evidence references in the Asset profile.
30
HighAction CardRegistry 1
Review 507 Work Orders · PM03 + 201
Next Operational Step
Review the Work Orders rated by this rule and determine their operational sequence.
Why It Matters
The company configured this rating for this exact combination of criteria.
Why Now?
Current evidenced finding: 507 Work Orders match the active rule. No due date is inferred from this match.
Methodological Limits
Exact comparison of PM type and maintenance activity type. MaintPilot adds no criteria, weighting or urgency.
Expected Benefit
Company-defined criticality can be addressed consistently with a visible rule basis.
Traceability (1 Evidence item)
- PM03 + 201Operational Intelligence rules
PM type = PM03; maintenance activity type = 201; rating = High; matching Work Orders = 507. Rule configured under: Settings → Operational Intelligence → Criticality Rules.
Methodological Limit
The Action text is taken directly from the Knowledge Card's Best Practice field. Operational significance, time-based urgency and Methodological Limits are shown separately. No Action is created without a registered category, Evidence and a valid Explain reference. The Action Engine uses the Priority class and Priority value from the evidenced Knowledge Card without modification; ties are sorted consistently by Action ID. Priority is not a probability.
05Decision · Reports
The same rationale from the cockpit to the report
The report carries the selected data point, the Findings for Packaging Line J and the supported Action into a structured management view.
Production and management receive the same traceable basis for the decision.
Executive Report
EnterprisePreview of the rule-based A4 report. The PDF button opens your browser’s print dialog, where you can select ‘Save as PDF’.
MaintPilot
Executive Maintenance Report
Decision-ready Maintenance information for Plant management
1
Management Summary
Rule-based summary of management statements supported by Evidence.
726 Work Orders are rated Critical or High by active company rules.
Daily Intelligence provides 5 evidenced rule Findings as the Data Basis. The operational sequence is shown only in Action Intelligence.
27 Assets are critical and 28 require attention; only assessments with medium or high Assessment Reliability are included.
The quantifiable rule-based reduction potential is CHF 2k.
2
Executive KPIs
Management perspectives with transparent data limitations.
Risk
726
Critical and High-rated Work Orders based on the active company configuration.
- Critical Work Orders
- 219
- High-rated Work Orders
- 507
Availability
Cannot be calculated
Production time and downtime are not included in the available data.
- Open Breakdown Work Orders 101/102
- 219
- Overdue open Work Orders
- 217
Capital
CHF 57.29M
Known inventory value; reduction potential based only on evidenced rules.
- Rule-based reduction potential
- CHF 2k
- Inventory values known
- 3'088
Maintenance
427
active Maintenance Items; does not indicate maintenance effectiveness.
- Total items
- 427
- Active indicator unknown
- 0
- Incomplete context
- 0
Data Quality
0
Field-specific Data Quality Findings; a record may be counted more than once.
- Finding types
- 0
- Reliably assessed Assets
- 64
3
Top Risks
Critical or high-Priority issues evidenced by rules.
CriticalDI-R002
Escalate overdue high-Priority Work Orders
27 open high-Priority Work Orders are overdue based on their scheduled finish dates.
Evidence: Affected Work Orders 27 · Maximum overdue period 47 days · Actual costs posted to date CHF 147'075
Needs attentionDI-R004
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders
214 open Work Orders with activity type 101/102 require operational prioritisation.
Evidence: Additional open Breakdown Work Orders 214 · Actual costs posted to date CHF 1'331'965
CriticalDI-R001
Review critical Spare Parts with no Stock
One A/Z part has no Stock and may present a supply risk.
Evidence: A/Z parts with no Stock 1 · Of which Z parts 1
Needs attentionDI-R003
Reduce the overdue Work Order backlog
190 additional open Work Orders are overdue; high-Priority Work Orders are assessed separately.
Evidence: Additional overdue Work Orders 190 · Average overdue period 34 days · Maximum overdue period 47 days
Needs attentionPM-R001
Review overdue Maintenance Items
143 Maintenance Items have a next date before the cut-off date.
Evidence: Overdue Maintenance Items 143 · Maximum overdue period 28 days
4
Top Decisions
Up to five deterministically prioritised management decisions.
CriticalDI-R002
Escalate overdue high-Priority Work Orders
Action: Clarify ownership, the date and the next Action for the affected Work Orders today.
Benefit: Reduce risk · Improve availability
Evidence: Affected Work Orders 27 · Maximum overdue period 47 days · Actual costs posted to date CHF 147'075
HighDI-R004
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders
Action: Review the Breakdown Work Orders by Asset context and impact, then define the next operational steps.
Benefit: Improve availability · Reduce risk
Evidence: Additional open Breakdown Work Orders 214 · Actual costs posted to date CHF 1'331'965
CriticalDI-R001
Review critical Spare Parts with no Stock
Action: Prioritise a review of availability, lead times and alternatives for the affected materials.
Benefit: Reduce risk · Improve availability
Evidence: A/Z parts with no Stock 1 · Of which Z parts 1
HighDI-R003
Reduce the overdue Work Order backlog
Action: Group the backlog by age and operational risk, then define a realistic completion plan.
Benefit: Save time · Reduce risk
Evidence: Additional overdue Work Orders 190 · Average overdue period 34 days · Maximum overdue period 47 days
HighPM-R001
Review overdue Maintenance Items
Action: Review and schedule Maintenance Items by overdue period and operational risk.
Benefit: Reduce risk · Improve availability
Evidence: Overdue Maintenance Items 143 · Maximum overdue period 28 days
5
Asset Health
Rule-based assessment of the available Maintenance data for each Functional Location.
Median Asset Health
62 / 100
Median and distribution of Asset Health Scores with medium or high Assessment Reliability. This is not a weighted Plant condition or a failure prediction.
- Reliably assessed Assets
- 64
- Assets without reliable assessments
- 0
Median Data Coverage
100 %
Only assessments with medium or high Assessment Reliability are included.
- Critical
- 27
- Attention
- 28
- Good
- 9
CriticalAsset Health
Production Unit 05
MPA1-PRD-U-05: Health 48 / 100 with 100 % Data Coverage.
Evidence: Open Work Orders 14 · Open Breakdowns 101/102 9
CriticalAsset Health
Production Unit 29
MPA1-PRD-U-29: Health 49 / 100 with 100 % Data Coverage.
Evidence: Open Work Orders 14 · Open Breakdowns 101/102 10
CriticalAsset Health
Production Unit 25
MPA1-PRD-U-25: Health 49 / 100 with 100 % Data Coverage.
Evidence: Open Work Orders 14 · Open Breakdowns 101/102 9
CriticalAsset Health
Production Unit 17
MPA1-PRD-U-17: Health 50 / 100 with 100 % Data Coverage.
Evidence: Open Work Orders 14 · Open Breakdowns 101/102 9
CriticalAsset Health
Production Unit 56
MPA1-PRD-U-56: Health 50 / 100 with 100 % Data Coverage.
Evidence: Open Work Orders 13 · Open Breakdowns 101/102 8
6
Work Order Status
Open, overdue and Breakdown-related Work Orders with actual costs posted to date.
Open Work Orders
854
Open Work Orders according to the imported Work Order source and status.
- Overdue
- 217
- Without a scheduled finish date
- 0
Overdue with high Priority
27
Only open Work Orders with a scheduled finish date before the cut-off date.
- Cut-off date
- 2026-07-18
Open Breakdown Work Orders 101/102
219
Only activity types 101 and 102 are interpreted as Breakdowns.
- Activity types
- 101 / 102
Actual costs posted to open Work Orders to date
CHF 5'293'401
Sum of total actual costs; empty values are treated as 0.
- Open Work Orders
- 854
7
Spare Part Risks
Supply Risks and rule-based, quantifiable capital potential.
Critical A/Z parts with no Stock
1
A or Z classification with Stock at 0.
- Critical Recommendations
- 2
Below recorded Safety Stock
13
Only records with available Stock and recorded Safety Stock.
- Total Spare Parts
- 3'088
Known inventory value
CHF 57.29M
Sum of available inventory values; missing values are not estimated.
- Inventory values known
- 3'088
Rule-based reduction potential
CHF 2k
Only B/C parts with no Stock Turnover, recorded Safety Stock and an evidenced price.
- Assessable candidates
- 1
8
Maintenance
Evidenced Maintenance context without indicating effectiveness or the correct frequency.
Maintenance Items
427
Number of adopted Maintenance Items.
- Active indicator known
- 427
Active Maintenance Items
427
Does not indicate maintenance effectiveness.
- Active indicator unknown
- 0
Incomplete Maintenance context
0
Items with a missing Functional Location, strategy or cycle.
- Without a strategy
- 0
- Without a cycle
- 0
9
Data Quality
Field-specific Findings; a record may be counted under several Finding types.
10
Recommended Actions
Up to five rule-based, prioritised next steps supported by Evidence.
CriticalDI-R002
Escalate overdue high-Priority Work Orders
Action: Clarify ownership, the date and the next Action for the affected Work Orders today.
Benefit: Reduce risk · Improve availability
Evidence: Affected Work Orders 27 · Maximum overdue period 47 days · Actual costs posted to date CHF 147'075
HighDI-R004
Prioritise open Breakdown Work Orders
Action: Review the Breakdown Work Orders by Asset context and impact, then define the next operational steps.
Benefit: Improve availability · Reduce risk
Evidence: Additional open Breakdown Work Orders 214 · Actual costs posted to date CHF 1'331'965
CriticalDI-R001
Review critical Spare Parts with no Stock
Action: Prioritise a review of availability, lead times and alternatives for the affected materials.
Benefit: Reduce risk · Improve availability
Evidence: A/Z parts with no Stock 1 · Of which Z parts 1
HighDI-R003
Reduce the overdue Work Order backlog
Action: Group the backlog by age and operational risk, then define a realistic completion plan.
Benefit: Save time · Reduce risk
Evidence: Additional overdue Work Orders 190 · Average overdue period 34 days · Maximum overdue period 47 days
HighPM-R001
Review overdue Maintenance Items
Action: Review and schedule Maintenance Items by overdue period and operational risk.
Benefit: Reduce risk · Improve availability
Evidence: Overdue Maintenance Items 143 · Maximum overdue period 28 days
11
Methodology
Limitations and sources of the reported statements.
The report is generated entirely by rules from the data adopted in MaintPilot and the operationally approved Intelligence engines.
Asset Health is a rule-based assessment of the available Maintenance data, not a condition measurement or failure prediction.
Asset availability is not calculated without production time and downtime data.
Maintenance context establishes neither the effectiveness nor the correct frequency of a Maintenance Item.
Spare Part Risks are not attributed to individual Assets without a reliable material-to-Asset assignment.
Report cut-off date: 2026-07-18.
The PDF is created locally using your browser’s print function. Report data is not uploaded or stored. For the best result, use A4 paper, 100% scale, background graphics, and headers and footers for page numbering.
No AI, no large language models and no new data source.
What you have seen
From an unusual signal to a traceable decision.
You have seen how MaintPilot identifies change, explains Relationships, prioritizes Actions and makes decisions traceable. The demo uses synthetic data only and ends without registration or storage.